Webmaster Forums - Webmaster forum for HTML, PHP, ASP, CSS and more

Go Back   Webmaster Forums - Webmaster forum for HTML, PHP, ASP, CSS and more > Webmaster Forums Lounge > Just Chat
User Name
Password

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-20-2007, 01:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
administrator
Administrator
 
administrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 151
Default US judge refuses to dismiss Google trademark suit

SAN FRANCISCO, April 18 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge refused on Wednesday to dismiss a lawsuit against Google Inc. (GOOG.O: Quote, Profile, Research) that charges the Web search leader's AdWords program abuses trademarks.

In making his decision to allow the case to move forward, U.S. District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled the public has an interest in whether AdWords, the company's popular pay-per-click advertising system, violates U.S. trademark law.

American Blind & Wallpaper Factory Inc., the top U.S. reseller of window blinds, charged in its lawsuit that Google abuses trademarks by allowing rivals of a company to buy ads that appear when consumers search the Web for information on that business.

Google has prevailed in two prior trademark suits filed against its pay-per-click ads. Auto insurer GEICO lost a federal case in Virginia, and computer repair site Rescuecom lost a similar federal case, but is appealing.

The latest ruling granted some claims while rejecting others in Google's motion for summary judgment, which asked the judge to dismiss American Blind's trademark infringement claims against Google's AdWords ad-selling program.

"The large number of businesses and users affected by Google's AdWords program indicates that a significant public interest exists in determining whether the AdWords program violates trademark law," Fogel wrote in his decision.

A Google spokesman said the company still has a motion for sanctions against American Blinds pending before Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg, in the same federal court, alleging that American Blinds failed to disclose key evidence.

"Judge Fogel rightfully concluded that they did not prove that two of their marks are protectable, and we are confident that they will be unable to prove their remaining claims at trial," Michael Kwun, Google's litigation counsel said in a statement.
administrator is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Points Per Thread View: 1.00
Points Per Thread: 11.00
Points Per Reply: 5.00



» Sponsors

» Links

» Affiliates
Web Hosting
Online Backup Reviews
Marketing Find
Merchant Select
SiteMap Builder
Host Compare
Dedicated Servers

» Links

» Sports Network
Paintball Forum
Football Forum
Hockey Forum
Golf Forum
Boxing Forum
Lacrosse Forum
Baseball Forum
SnowBoarding Forum
Soccer Forum
MMA Forum


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.



LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Webmaster Forums